Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Terin Miller's avatar

Ah, Jackie: I agree 100%. It's the "promise" and "premise" of science/technology.

Originally, it was seen as replacing the mundane drudgery of working - robots, etc - to provide humanity more 'leisure time.' Sadly, no one who thought that way (see the movie Metropolis, which my father loved to show in his Anthropology classes) thought about the need for 'work,' let alone wages/income. OR 'emotions.'

It's to me similar to the android character 'Data' in Start Trek: The Next Generation, who is constantly seeking (like Pinocchio) to be "a real human," with emotions. Emotions are human. Art is human. As far as anyone has been able to determine. In fact, one could argue: emotions define humanity.

Which is why technologists are trying so hard - like making 'plant-based meat' or tofu shrimp - to imbue machines (AI are programs, code, that cause electrons to fire in certain ways along predetermined pathways - unlike the human brain, which CREATES NEW PATHWAYS with electrons) with 'human' qualities: creativity being first among them.

AI can generate words/things/plots/whatever. But it NEEDS A DATABASE on which to draw. And that database is language, WITHOUT NUANCE, SUBTLETY, or emotional context.

It's a reason also the idea of "cloning" is flawed: you can reproduce a copy of someone's DNA, but it's hardly all that makes someone's personality. Just as even identical twins are DIFFERENT PEOPLE, so each human personality is created by experiences and reaction, as well as adaptation. In fact, that (according to my parents) is one of the three mandates of survival for ANY species: adapt, mutate, or die.

Personally, I, too, don't worry that AI is going to 'replace' me as a writer - except, perhaps, in the eyes of a publisher looking to not have to pay royalties to a human creator.

Like the 'Monkey Experiment,' I do not think you could TEACH a group of code, or even self-generating code, to reproduce anything but Shakespeare's words. Or plots. But NOT his 'writing.'

It takes true emotion to recognize tragedy, love, emotional pain, trauma, redemption or even the significance of the end of all our stories: death.

Anyone who thinks, again, that AI can someday replace writers or other artists, just needs to listen to Bernstein's conducting of Barber's Adagio for Strings. The day AI can get that image of man trying to touch the hand of God in a sound, is the day we should all worry. IMHO.

(Next time you need plot ideas: call your friends! I know I won't live long enough to write all the books I want! If I could write them like you, I'd be thrilled!)

Expand full comment

No posts

Ready for more?